"The O'Neil Naltrexone Implant"
Source: Today Tonight
Published: 10 Jul 2007
Category: Pharmaceutical
Rating:
(2 stars)
what they said (Hover the mouse cursor over underlined words for more info)
His medical devices are already saving lives all over the world, but his latest is set to revolutionise the treatment of all sorts of illnesses.
The original article can be found at: http://au.todaytonight.yahoo.com/article/39984/none/oneil-naltrexone-implant
| Criteria |
Rating |
| Novelty of Treatment |
Not Satisfactory (?) |
| Availability of Treatment |
Satisfactory (?) |
| Treatment Options |
Not Satisfactory (?) |
| Disease Mongering |
Satisfactory (?) |
| Evidence |
Not Satisfactory (?) |
| Quantification of Benefits of Treatment |
Not Satisfactory (?) |
| Harms of Treatment |
Not Satisfactory (?) |
| Costs of Treatment |
Not Satisfactory (?) |
| Sources of Information |
Satisfactory (?) |
| Relies on Press Release |
Not Applicable |
what we said (Hover the mouse cursor over underlined words for more info)
We have been here before. Conventional naltrexone tablets have been trialled with mixed results and are not widely seen as effective. A naltrexone implant (there is more than one formulation available worldwide) may well improve adherence with therapy and improve results. But, by conventional standards, the evidence is not yet available that treatment is effective and acceptably safe. The evidence cited in this article is not sufficient to justify widespread use outside of a clinical trial and the journalist and his informants should have made this clear. Breathless claims of success are inappropriate in this setting but particularly so here where they can engender hope that is not matched by the reality. The challenge to investigators here is not to tackle their critics but recognise that the burden of proof rests on them to prove the efficacy and safety of their products.
public forum
|